004. January 26, 2019
Jan. 26th, 2019 07:01 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
thisweekmod posting in ![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
thisweekmetaI'm sure you all know this already, but: Always check the comments on a thing! A discussion post is just the starting point-- comments are the continuation and often end up even more interesting than the original post.
And speaking of comments: you are totally welcome to leave any kind of comment here. A response to a link, an idea for a new link, a tip or question about the newsletter-- anything goes.
Onto the issue!
thisweekmeta collects links of fandom meta and discussions from all over the web, and welcomes submissions from readers. If you know of an excellent fandom discussion post that we've missed, whether new or old, please feel free to leave a comment on this newest issue or email the editor.
The FAQ can be found here, and our editorial guidelines can be found here. Questions, concerns, and feedback are all welcomed.
Newer Stuff
cfiesler posted How does new canon impact fanfiction production?: "In looking at the relationship between two of the questions - how often respondents write fanfiction and when they are most likely to write fanfiction - we see that people who write fanfiction more often are less impacted by new canon, and people who write less frequently are more likely to be inspired by new canon."
fairestcat posted On Fandom and the "culture of selling": "Does joining someone's Patreon or tipping them on Ko-Fi or purchasing a fanwork from them change that relationship? Probably. But not as much as some old-school fans seem to think."
quiltingsarah (Reddit) posted The olden days of fanfiction-share your memories: "The first sort of fanfic I read was in a magazine that had a story in installments I got at a Doctor Who convention in the early 1980's. it was a Star Trek/Who xo, never did read the end of it because I only found the first 2. So I'd go to cons, pick up the occasional zine."
quinfirefrorefiddle posted Fandom History- A Quick Rundown: "There are certain events, trends, or facts in fandom that were important enough, or in some cases just weird enough, that I'm always kind of surprised when I meet a fan who hasn't heard of them. Totally unfair, of course, I learn about fandom history I've never heard of before all the time."
Rhodanum (Pillowfort) posted THE PREQUEL TRILOGY IN THE 2000s -- A WOMAN-RUN STAR WARS FANDOM: "One thing that gets lost when discussing the history of Star Wars is how heavily female-dominated the fandom for the Prequel Trilogy was, particularly in the 2000s. Fan-site after fan-site, fan-shrine after fan-shrine, the userbases of which were overwhelmingly girls and women."
Steven T. Wright for Ars Technica posted “The Linux of social media”—How LiveJournal pioneered (then lost) blogging: "Growing up on the Web at the dawn of the social media age (circa 2007), it felt like all the connectivity-obsessed sites forming the burgeoning core of the new Internet were haunted by a faded spectre called LiveJournal. As a teen, I never actually knew anyone who had one, but I heard whispers and rumors about drama on the service all the time."
Flashback - be back soon.
Link taken down! I'll put a new one up later today. In consideration of the link owner, I have also screened comments that a) had the link or a related one, b) a Google-able quote, c) link owner's name.
no subject
Date: 2019-01-26 05:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2019-01-26 05:28 pm (UTC)Though I really like linking to old stuff, and find it really valuable to have that history there. And some people just aren't going to be reachable to ask any more.
(opens a parenthetical aside, gets distracted by cat, forgets what was going in this space)
no subject
Date: 2019-01-26 05:34 pm (UTC)There are other options, though! I could link to older fan sites, or highlight academic fan stuff instead.
no subject
Date: 2019-01-26 05:41 pm (UTC)And in some cases the authors are still in fandom and active, in some cases they have left fandom, and in some cases they're actually dead.
no subject
Date: 2019-01-26 06:01 pm (UTC)totally ot but...
Date: 2019-01-27 11:01 pm (UTC)Well, speaking as an aca-fan, a lot of us wrote meta on our fannish journals which (in my case at least) turned into the gateway drug for writing scholarship!
no subject
Date: 2019-01-26 05:39 pm (UTC)Yeah, me too. But IDK, I think it was the combination of the post being that old/mostly a vent/linked to directly on the LJ version that gave me misgivings. I really don't know that much about Fanlore -- I don't tend to use it.
no subject
Date: 2019-01-26 05:46 pm (UTC)But on the other hand, I shouldn't have been an asshole, so it serves me right, and I think recording how that went down is important part of how late era LJ fandom fell down.
I mostly use fanlore for definitions of things, rather than for the history aspect.
no subject
Date: 2019-01-26 05:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2019-01-26 05:58 pm (UTC)